(by Horst_In_Translation on 13 September 2016)

Obviously not. But the plot is not the biggest problem here if they had actually constructed this story around interesting settings and characters. "Das Verrätertor" is a co-production between the United Kingdom and West Germany from 1964, so this one already had its 50th anniversary 2 years ago. It should be no surprise to anybody as a consequence that this is still a black-and-white film. Of course, it has sound as the silent era was long gone. The director is Freddie Francis and the writer who adapted Edgar Wallace's work here was Jimmy Sangster and the mention of Wallace should already tell you what to expect here. It is a crime movie with occasional subtle humor just like they all are, even if this one is English language in the original and not German like so many others. The cast is mostly British, which is why I am not familiar with any of the names here. No idea if these actors are still known in Britain. However, Klaus Kinski and Adrian Hoven are, of course, still very well-known here in Germany because of their bodies of work, even if they are long gone of course. The title advertises the film with Kinski, but this is really just audience bait as his character is everything but a crucial core character in this film. Most of the time, he is just standing around honestly. It is a bit more unusual compared to other Wallace films as there is much more focus on the bad guys here than on the cops trying to catch them. And you also see that it is a more British film than usual because of the plot being all about stealing the Jewels from the Tower. The Royals are mentioned on several occasions. But sadly, these 85 minutes are also proof that different does not always mean good. i was as underwhelmed by this one here as by most of the other Edgar Wallace films I have seen, so yes, I am certainly biased by having seen so much from the series. It all feels really mediocre and sometimes even downright unrealistic. There's one or two blatant examples of moments that really did not make any sense at all in every Wallace movie and I don't think it can be excused from the comedic entertainment perspective. Also not too much a fan of happy endings pushed into the audience's faces like it is the case here and lets be honest: The characters and their purposes rarely differ at all in these Edgar Wallace films. It all feels interchangeable and all this is also very true for "Traitor's Gate". Don't watch.